This is the consideration of the judge in rejecting Nadiem Makarim's preliminary lawsuit

Jakarta – The single judge at the South Jakarta District Court (PN Jakel) rejected the provisional lawsuit filed by former Minister of Education and Culture Nadiem Anwar Makarim. In his considerations, the judge said that the attorney -general’s office nominated the suspect on the basis of more than two evidence. “Considering that the respondent, based on the above cases described above, has four valid evidence according to the provisions of Section 184 of the Criminal Procedure Act as a basis for determining the applicant as a suspect,” said Monday (13/10/2025) that the single judge I Ketut Darrawan said in the main course of the South Jakarta. “Since the respondent’s conduct to determine the applicant as a suspect, according to the judge, was the judge, on the basis of the considerations made above, according to the law,” the judge continued. Browse to continue with the content in his considerations, the judge also answered the request regarding the need for evidence in the form of the calculation of state losses as one of the minimum two evidence to identify a suspect. According to the judge, this is the authority of the investigator. “Because it is a form to test the authority of the investigator in terms of choosing to use any evidence to prove his suspicions against the suspect,” the judge explained. “Every choice made by the investigator will have consequences with the strength of the evidence to prove whether the actions of the suspect are fulfilling the elements of the alleged criminal law,” he continued. The judge also said that he did not agree with the statement that information regarding the determination of a suspect should be transferred to potential suspects already identified. The judge said it would create legal uncertainty. “Considering that with regard to the terminology of potential suspect used after the ruling number of the Constitutional Court 21 of 2014, especially with regard to the status of someone who was previously a witness and then named as a suspect, according to the judge, as the applicant was appointed as a suspect that he would give a potential suspect,” said it would say to a fundamental problems. “Then the judge explained that Nadiem’s ​​detention by the Attorney General’s office was also appropriate because Nadiem was charged with an article imposed by a fine of more than five years in prison. The respondent then used his authority to arrest the respondent, “the judge said.” Investigators expressed concern that the applicant would run away, destroy or disappear or repeat criminal acts, “he continued. of the applicant’s petition, namely an order that the applicant did not submit the case before the preliminary application is decided, and that the provisional judge orders the respondent to suspend or transfer the detention of the applicant is not within the authority of the preliminary judge, “the judge explained.” and should be rejected, “the judge came to the conclusion. On this basis, the judge’s preliminary rejected. The investigation into the alleged corruption case in the acquisition of Chromebook shooters with the suspect Nadiem Makarim is valid and may be continued.” has been dismissed. Lembong-Hasto ”here: (ond/WHN)