Can America and China work together in the field of artificial intelligence?

Openai has so far introduced its most advanced models in the field of artificial intelligence, which confirms the ability to solve mathematical problems and complicated software. The leading starting business in this industry, the market value of which is estimated at approximately $ 150 billion, explained that these models could increase the risk of abuse of artificial intelligence in the development of biological weapons. It is normal for this dangerous possibility of causing anxiety, and emphasizes the need to impose a more difficult control over artificial intelligence. But despite the ongoing warnings of industry leaders, academics and experts for almost two years about the risk of abuse of this technology, the United States has not yet issued federal legislation in this regard. At the same time, there are noises inside and outside the technological sector that the exaggerated warnings are derived from the most urgent challenges, such as possible violation of intellectual property rights, the spread of deep forgery and misleading information, along with job loss. However, lawmakers did not take any concrete measures to address these risks. China still promotes one of the most important arguments against the Artificial Intelligence Organization is the fear of its negative impact on innovation, which could lead to the United States losing the technological breed against China. Despite the strict control and ongoing US efforts to prevent it from reaching the important components of artificial intelligence systems, China will continue to progress quickly in this area. While the export restrictions have somewhat obstructed, Beijing, it performs in the set of standards for the development and use of this comprehensive technology that forms the cornerstone of our time. The authoritarian regime in China facilitates the establishment of strict laws, even if it seems to be the technology industry. Although China’s goals differ compared to other countries, as the government focuses mainly on maintaining social stability and ensuring that the ruling party remains in power, it sees artificial intelligence as a strategic priority. For this reason, the Chinese government is working closely with the private sector to improve innovation, while the state is strictly supervised and controlled by the state. Despite political differences, lessons from China are lessons that the United States can learn from China, which mainly face the fear through a mix of new legislation and dependence on judicial precedents. In 2022, CyberSecurity Security Agencies issued laws to combat deep forgery aimed at protecting the victims whose photos were used without their approval, and imposed illustrative marks on digitally modified content. Chinese courts also set criteria for the use of artificial intelligence instruments, and have issued decisions to protect the fields of artists and prevent the exploitation of their voices. The broader temporary laws in China were obliged by the developers of obstetric intelligence with the participation of details on how to train algorithms with government agencies, in addition to strict safety tests. (A part of these assessments aims to ensure that the results are compatible with socialist values). However, the regulatory authorities have shown flexibility and withdrew some of the most striking requirements after receiving reactions from the industrial sector, which reflects their willingness to work closely with the technological sector while maintaining the necessary supervision and supervision. Slow US legislation This position contradicts the efforts of the United States, as lawsuits related to artificial intelligence are slowly filed in the courts, while the absence of federal law remains clear. The lack of clear guidelines also increases a state of security among business leaders. US organizational bodies can follow China’s example, focus on specific laws that target known risks and work closely with the industry to develop preventative controls to confront future existential risks. In the absence of federal law, some US states have taken over. Last month, California lawmakers agreed to a draft law aimed at improving the integrity of artificial intelligence, as companies have responsibility if their tools are used to cause “serious damage”, such as the introduction of a biological weapon. Many technology companies, including ‘oben ai’, have strongly opposed this law, on the pretext that such legislation must be within the jurisdiction of Congress. A general message from entrepreneurs and researchers in the field of artificial intelligence also confirmed that the impact of the draft law ‘catastrophic’ will be on innovation, which will enable countries such as China to ‘make the scene in the development of this advanced technology’. Policymakers should remember that prominent numbers in the technological sector have used this argument to prevent any legislation for a long time, even before they are obsessed with artificial intelligence. As far as the United States is not yet able to vote on laws to prevent the worst scenarios associated with artificial intelligence, not to mention the treatment of the most urgent risks. The need for international cooperation In the end, China cannot be used as an excuse for effective control over artificial intelligence, as dealing with this challenge as a zero match between the United States and China will not lead to winners. There is also difficult to have mutual doubts and escalating geopolitical tensions to visualize close collaboration between the two countries to reduce potential risks, but that does not necessarily mean that things have to go that way. The pioneers of artificial intelligence who have contributed to the development of this technology are one of the most powerful supporters of legislation. A number of ‘artificial intelligence pioneers’, including the ‘torring’ awards winners such as Yoshua Bennjio, Jeffrey Hinton and Andrew Yao, met this month in Italy and asked to strengthen international cooperation. Despite their awareness of the increasing geopolitical competition, they warned that the loss of control of artificial intelligence or its malignant use could lead to catastrophic results for humanity. ” They also offered a framework for a global system aimed at organizing this advanced technology. Many people claim that this category is wrong, but the size of the risks associated with artificial intelligence seems very large to the extent that it is difficult to ignore. Washington policymakers to Beijing should benefit from the experiences of these scientists, who at least have proven that it is possible to find a common foundation for collaboration to face the challenges of artificial intelligence.