A number of the largest daring capital investors in the “Silicon Valley”, secretly, within the glass walls, express their happiness on the choice of Donald Trump JD wagons as a candidate for the post of vice president. Resentment over the negative public response to technological enterprises, as well as disappointment in President Joe Biden, has led an ideological shift in the ‘Silicon Valley’ to the judge stream over the past few years, led by a number of daring capital investors. If Trump wins and his new deputy has his view to fight monopoly, his appointment can eventually be a challenge for the dominance of major technology companies. While this will be a welcome change, this is the way he seeks to eliminate progressive values that have supported the world of technology for years. Investors’ support has shifted, many senior capital investors celebrated the nomination of a person they considered one of them, and the partner in ‘Founding Fund’, Delian ASBhouen, said in a post on the ‘X’ platform – ‘Twitter’ – we have a former investor in the Withuis technological sector. The praise of the shammat of the other. I asked an Israeli investor on his opinion on the news on Tuesday, he raised his grip in the air and smiled a wide smile. while Musk promised to donate $ 45 million a month. in the world and who, from a permanent opponent of Trump to a supporter of the ‘power’ movement (the slogan of the Trump campaign ‘Made America Great Again’). Although the motive for the large shift in the direction of Vans, which was announced, was more ideological, the shift in the position of investors in the technological sector was overshadowed by the financial motif. Where they felt resentment towards Biden because of his proposal to set up a minimum of 25% at billionaires, and feared that he would exaggerate the organization of artificial intelligence, in addition to its clear enmity, the encrypted currencies, which Trump and fans adopted, also did not help. Technology companies that reduce diversity, equality and inclusion programs, as the technological sector has seen a cultural adjustment over the past two years, which has ended to follow a more realistic management method and become opportunities and utilize them. The time for the reputation that the region was known for the generous benefits and the functions of the comfortable middle management level, after the hard tactics that Musk applied to Twitter, where he ended the service of 80% of employees last year. It is alleged that this step covers the heads of other technology companies to make similar hairstyles, including companies that have ended the service of trust and security teams. Meanwhile, technology companies such as “Zoom Technologies”, “Google” and “Mita” diversity, equality and inclusion programs have reduced that they implemented after the death of George Floyd, as well as the reforms that coincided with a surprising and disturbing decline in the number of women in the technological sector. In any case, ‘Silicon Valley’ is a place where intuition and fear of missing opportunities are strong motives for change. Therefore, the presence of wagons in the White House, and the credibility of this in his speech, such as migration and miscarriage, can lead to greater absence of progressive values in the “Silicon Valley”. Vans attempts to end the dominance of the most important technology companies, although technology experts have ignored Trump’s aggressive remarks about diversity and immigration during his presidency between 2016 and 2020, and Van’s opinions have his distinctive weight. As a former investor, he was not ashamed to express his underestimation of diversity programs, and recently tweeted about “the nonsense of diversity, equality and inclusion at sector level” in technology and “left -front -bias” in artificial intelligence instruments such as “Gemini”, which indicate “Google”, which indicates that the efforts to protect art. Things we don’t know about wagons. The presidents of the presidents have a history of marginalization, and there is a wonderful opportunity for Trump to do the same with his 39 -year -old candidate for the post. Of course, this did not happen to all the representatives of the presidents, and remember the influence of Dick Cheney on foreign policy decisions and national security after the September 11 attacks. Similarly, Vans’s opinions on technology, which he talked about more of any other candidate for the post of Vice President, is complicated. He is a Thuil student, spent 6 years with 3 different companies investing daring capital, and most of his focus focused on emerging businesses in the middle of the Western United States, before founding his company “Narya Ventures”. He also explicitly exposed the dominance of the most important technology companies, including ‘alphabet’, ‘Meta’ and ‘Microsoft’, and attacked the laws of artificial intelligence that could ‘hold the importance of current positions’. He also used his influence to support anti -monopoly measures that were hit by the federal trading committee against major technology companies, and tweeted: “It’s time to divide (Google).” This opinion did not cause the controversy as expected in the ‘Silicon Valley’, especially not among the daring capital investors, whose emerging businesses often have to use cloud services for major technology companies. The daring capital investors and major technology companies connect a cunning relationship because they have to gently interact with the managers who can buy their startups, but those who dominate the market and those with skills impede the growth of their investments. From this point of view, diversity profits are at risk, and Vans tries to balance two different elbows in ‘Silicon Valley’ as there are major technology companies, a large network of startups and fat investors on the other. The tie is narrowed to the most important technology companies without harming startups or investors, or investors will not be easy if Vans is serious about providing equal opportunities, but addressing a foreign imbalance in the market in favor of major technology companies is a long time. However, since the application of anti -monopoly laws in the United States can be slow and exhausting, it is likely that the greatest influence of Fance will be to re -support the cultural transformation in the ‘Silicon Valley’ on the culture of the elite technology, where she will strengthen statements on all topics on the coming months on the coming months. The small profits achieved by the ‘Silicon Valley’ have brought more women and ethnic minorities to the world of technology more than ever before. And if this legacy that will leave from to the region and the sector, it will be a disappointing heritage.
Trump’s candidate for the Vice President trying to restore the glory of “Silicon Valley”
