Universities shout in dealing with artificial intelligence

The increasing controversy over artificial intelligence in the academic circles in Singapore emphasizes the size of the confusion in determining the supposed role of this turmoil within the higher education system. A student at the University of “Nianang Technology” has published a post on the “Reddit” platform stating that she uses a digital instrument to arrange the references in a research article according to the alphabet. But after observing some typographic errors, it is charged with violating the rules for using obstetric intelligence instruments. Soon, the case expanded with the filing of two similar complaints, one of which stated that the owner was punished for the use of ‘Chat BTT’ in the initial research phase, although it did not adopt it in writing. The university, which announces its support for the use of artificial intelligence in the educational process, initially accepted a strict position and defended the policy of ‘Not Lenient’ in this issue with statements by local media. The interaction of Internet users and their sympathy for the student who raised the case on “Reddit” urged the university to withdraw, to announce the student later to accept her appeal and cancel the charge of “academic fraud” from her record, amid a wide welcoming from the digital community. Asia students are most affected. The story may seem just a short -lived academic dispute, but there is a good reason for its wide distribution, to harvest thousands of preferences and start intense discussions via the Internet. It revealed that a new mysterious reality facing university students and their professors while trying to keep up with the rapid development in the use of artificial intelligence or avoiding it in universities. Also read: Are universities another place of education in the Chatgpt -era? Although this controversy affects universities around the world, its resonance was stronger in Asia. Away from the stereotypes of strict mothers and excellent students in math, the rise of the region’s economy is often attributed to a strong focus on higher education. The importance of studying and studying for long hours in the hearts of children since their early years, but in the era of artificial intelligence, how will this model change? No one knows the answer yet. Despite the repeated promises of the pioneers of education technology that we are about “the greatest positive transformation seen by education in its history,” the indicators of academic performance have not yet accompanied the rate of accepting these instruments. There are no long -term studies that make the effect of artificial intelligence on learning and spiritual functions, while the disturbing titles warning that these instruments can make us lazy and less intelligent to stimulate fear. In the midst of this feverish race due to the failure of the knees, it is feared that an entire generation of emerging thoughts will turn into an experimental field. Teachers, who fight this challenge, do not consider ignoring reality. If some people try to limit the use of artificial intelligence, its dependence has become almost inevitable in the era of digital research. ‘Google’ is currently starting with the automatic summit with the search results, and just browsing it should not be an academic fraud. An informal survey conducted by a local media in Singapore this year included 500 high school students at the university, that 84% of their tools such as “Chat BT” use to complete school duties weekly. In China, several universities have begun to use instruments to detect fraud that is supported by artificial intelligence, despite their limited accuracy. Some students have said by the media that they are forced to simplify their writings not to be classified due to artificial intelligence instruments, or to spend money to test their papers in advance and ensure that they are passed on to tracking systems before delivery. Contrary to reality in the labor market, but you do not have to take business. In the midst of this chaos, the responsibility for teachers is increasing, and focuses on the learning process just as much as they focus on the results, according to Yiu Meng Che, Vice President of “Singapore University for Technology and Design” and responsible for academic matters and innovation in it. The purpose is not the demonization of artificial intelligence, but to deal with it as an educational instrument, while ensuring that the student understands the steps that brought him to the end result, even if he used technology. Also read: The vague is artificial intelligence within government curricula. This approach also provides a deeper understanding of what is produced by the instruments of artificial intelligence, which is still not ideal and is subject to hallucinations (or print errors). Finally, the professors who have a real impact on the lives of their students are not necessarily those who help them achieve the highest levels, but rather those who build a sincere relationship with them, teach their sympathy and the ability to solve the complex problems. Since the deepest and most important aspects of learning are still disobedient to automation. The Singapore edition reveals the size of the voltage associated with this transformation, as it is not yet clear whether a simple website for arranging references is originally regarded as a gym instruments. It also emphasized a remarkable paradox, namely that saving time on a monotonous task is an advantage welcomed when entering the labor market, if artificial intelligence did not obtain the beginners’ posts. Mastering the instruments of artificial intelligence has become a necessity in the labor market, and any university that makes a blind eye to this reality is limited to the preparation of its students to confront the real world. It is true that we have been away from understanding the full impact of artificial intelligence on education, and to define the best ways to use it in higher education. But in the midst of this exploratory path, we should not drown in the details and lose sight of the big picture.