Waqf Amendment Bill 2025: 'Many such countries near WAQF ...'

Deputy CM Vijay Sinha expressed happiness on the transition from the WAQF Bill. He said that the central government has a clear principle that we will not hold any laws for the voting bank. BJP national minister Rituraj Sinha said that WAQF has a lot of land that has no record. This is enough to understand why amendment was needed. State Bureau, Patna. Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sinha has expressed luck to accept the WAQF Bill. He said that it is the clear principle of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government that we will not hold any law for voting bank because the law for justice and well -being of people. It should not be a medium of wetting. Non-Islamic members do not have a place, the amendment of the WAQF Bill did not intervene in religious freedom anywhere. The changes made by this bill are of a purely administrative nature. No non-Islamic member found a place in the Waqf Council in the work related to religious donations. The work of non-Muslim members in the Waqf Council or its premises is not related to religious activities. The Charity Commissioner can become a person of any religion, he will ensure that the Council is operated according to the Charity Act. The center honored the constitutional values ​​by amending the WAQF Bill, the Modi government did not respect the judge’s order and constitutional values, but respected it. Therefore, the constitution of the country facing the country’s law and any community cannot be kind at all. Those who have theft in their minds are opposed to the Waqf Amendment, National BJP Minister Rituraj Sinha, congratulated all the MPs in support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Minister of Home Affairs, Amit Shah and Minister Welfare Minister Kiran Rijiju for the acceptance of the Waqf Amendment Account. He said that whose dishonest shop was closed, while people mourned the amendment of this bill and mourned the widow. The truth is that the bill is approved by the bill in the lives of Muslim women as well as backward and poor Muslims. Waqf still has many such countries that don’t even have a record? Isn’t that enough to understand why the amendment was needed? Now there will be stomach pain that grabs earlier under its cover or runs a landmafia store. Ruturaj said that there is no such law for any minority or majority in the world. Not only that, there is no such law, not even in Muslim countries, so what is the need for India to carry such a law? Despite the fact that WAQF has so much property, why is the minority class the most backward? After knowing all these aspects, it is clear that the need for change in this law in the country was needed for the importance of the country. Also read Bihar: ‘You want to seize the land of Muslims, but …’; What did Lalu say about the Waqf Amendment Bill a mistake with Nitish Kumar? JDU leaders opened the front on Waqf Bill, said: This is every big news of your city against Muslims, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.