During the hearing on the presidential references in the Supreme Court, the central government supported the rights of the governor to the bills. The court asked if the elected governments were dependent on non-elected governors. The Attorney General Tushar Mehta defended the powers of the governor while the court questioned the expectations of the constitutional makers. Mehta said governor could stop the accounts. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. During the ongoing hearing on the presidential references, the central government was approved by the central government with full confirmation and powers of the discretion and powers of the governor, but the Supreme Court also asked some questions. When it was said on behalf of the center that the governor had the right to stop any bill permanently, the court questioned that the elected governments did not depend on the will of the elected governor, if the bills could be stopped forever. The country met the expectations of the constitutional makers: the court, when the court advocated the center, Tushar Mehta, while referring to the appointment of the governor, constitutional powers and rights, referred to the debate in the Constitutional Assembly on the Constitutional Returns, the Apex Court asked whether the country would have a furor between the government and the government. The Attorney General avoided the question and said he mentioned these provisions in a different context. Mehta, while emphasizing the governor’s discretion to decide on the bills, said that the post of governor will be reduced to the postman without this power. However, during the hearing, the court also said that if any constitutional authority gains power, it is believed that they will follow it properly. The Attorney General said yes, it will not use the powers arbitrarily. But the CJI said again that even if it works at random, the status cannot be disputed on this basis. The CJI said that this is why he said in the beginning that there should be no politics in this matter, the court will declare the Constitution. The debate in the case will continue on Thursday. The Constitution Bank of five judges led by Chief Justice Br Gawai hears the presidential reference. President Draupadi Murmu sent a presidential reference to seek opinion of the Supreme Court on 14 constitutional questions. While retaining the center’s side of the center, Saliser -General Tushar Mehta said that the governor has the right to stop any account permanently. However, the use of this right must be very low. If a bill is sent to the governor for approval, they have four options. Approve the bill well, stop or return the house for reconsideration or send it to the president for consideration. The house is reconsidering the bill and sends it again for approval, then the governor cannot stop it. Mehta said the governor has a permanent power to stop the bill and a temporary power. In permanent power, the Governor’s Bill can stop permanently, so that the bill will end automatically. On the remarks of the non -elected Bank of the Governor, Mehta said that the governor is not a postman, but that he represents the government of India, he is appointed by the president. The president works on the advice of the Council of Ministers, which is responsible for Parliament. At the discretion of the governor, Mehta said that the bill is many times of such a nature that it cannot be approved. For example, if the country decides that it will not trade and trade from any country, but if a state passes a bill associated with the meeting business and trade, the subject of the state list is, but the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Foreign Ministry. Therefore, governor cannot approve such bills.
“What did the president ask for advice, what is the problem”, what did the SC say about the government’s arguments? – Supreme Court is investigating the governors on bills a detailed analysis
