'Temple at User, Why Are You Waqf by Users', SC -Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain asked questions about Waqf Properties - Vishnu Shankar Jain Challenges Waqf according to user concept, requires recycling of properties

Ani, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain questioned the justification of the concept of WAQF by claimed assets (WAQF by the user). Said that efforts should be made to withdraw the assets obtained on WAQF on user base. Vishnu Shankar Jain said there was a Shiva temple in Delhi, which was demolished. It has been said that Lord Shiva does not need protection. The Supreme Court confirmed this decision. If Temple Bai is not a user and church by the user, why should we be a waqf by the user? Waqf by user concept forbidden. Waqf by the user is a property that is considered a WAQF based on long -term use for religious or charity purposes, even without a document. What is the basis of WAQF by the user? In simple words, even if there is no real estate document, but on the basis of WAQF by the user, it is considered WAQF property, as it has been used as WAQF property for years. Jain said that Parliament reiterated that they would be declared the government’s property as WAQF property. Jain suggested that all matters related to the Waqf Amendment Act should be taken to the same Supreme Court and that a constitutional bank should be formed for their trial within six months.