Why not remove URLs containing walled videos from singer Kumar Sanu? Delhi HC Questions Meta and Google – Kumar Sanu Morphed Videos Supreme Court Questions Meta Google

Updated: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 07:20 pm (IST) on the petition of Kumar Sanu questioned the Delhi Meta High Court and Google about why their crushed videos and URLs for abusive language were not removed. The court instructed to take action under IT rules. Meta said the offensive words were removed, but could not determine what was wrong. The court asked the mediator to take action according to the rules. The next trial of the case is on October 15. Supreme Court Questions Meta and Google about singer Kumar Sanu’s petition. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. The Delhi High Court on Monday questioned the actions of Meta and Google about the petition filed by player Kumar Sanu, demanding the protection of personal rights. The Court asked Meta and Google why the Mosed Video and URLs for Abused Language related to Kumar Sanu could not be removed from both the Internet media? Remove ad Read only News A Bench of Justice Many Pritam Singh Arora asked the lawyer who appeared for Meta and Google to take instructions on why the corrupt videos and abusive language used on the URL should not be removed by the grievance officer according to the rules. The next trial on the case is on October 15. Meta said that the offensive word was specifically removed under the IT rules, but the internet media platform as arbitrator cannot decide what is wrong and what is not. The court will have to decide this case. It is also said that the mediator cannot decide on defamatory content. Also cited a decision from the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court said that Meteor could not be a super censorship. While commenting orally, the bank said that whatever the mediator could remove it should remove it. If any complaint comes to the mediator, you will have to act according to the rules. You come the next day and tell me what you have removed and what not? Because not everyone can come to court. The bank also ordered the lawyer who appeared to Kumar Sanu to provide details on the material that violates personal rights. Sanu sought protection on her personality rights and sought a ban on the use of her name, voice, singing style and technique, image, caricature, photos, signature and other features. The lawsuit says that the defendant offenders generate revenue from audio/videos associated with Kumar Sanu by uploading it on Internet network sites, including Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. The court earlier banned the use of the image, name and video of actor Abhishek Bachchan, actress and Abhishek’s wife Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and filmmaker Karan Johar. Also read- The Supreme Court strictly on delay in the parole of prisoners, the government of Delhi shouted