Are universities still a place of education in the era of chatgpt?

For many university students, it looks very easy these days. The duties required days of hard search can now be completed within minutes. The polished articles are available on request for any topic. There is no need to go into Dickens or Demostins writings; All relevant materials can be summarized immediately by simply sending one question to a robot. Welcome to the academic world in the era of artificial intelligence. Several recent reports have shown that the mandate of duties to artificial intelligence has become a routine. The irony is that students who are still struggling often seem less effective compared to their colleagues who do not. Students and professors use artificial intelligence. Professors find it difficult to make the distinction between the texts produced by computers and the students written by students, and the worst, that they start using artificial intelligence themselves to judge the actions of their students. This is an inductive situation: computers who have research written by computers, students and professors who observe carelessly, and parents pay tens of thousands of dollars in exchange for this feature annually. At a time when academic institutions are attacked by various angles, it seems to be a crisis about the explosion. The introduction of artificial intelligence within the university curricula seems logical in different ways, as some evidence suggests that it may improve the interaction. It also reforms job descriptions in different industries, and graduates are expected to be used to use it. Generally, this is a good thing due to improved productivity and acceleration of innovation. Artificial intelligence reduces the intellectual process, but most learning that occurs in universities is not professional. Humanities in particular have a higher message: to encourage critical thinking, to form spiritual habits, expand intellectual horizons to introduce students to ‘the best and thoughtful thought to it’, according to the words of Matthew Arnold. Mastering Aristotle’s thinking, Aquinas or Adam Smith needs much more than just a short phrase in which we will meet a chat robot, and it has many more benefits. Also read: The vague is artificial intelligence within the government curriculum, and it is not just an obsession for art amateurs; The ability to synthesize conflicting views and to take a deliberate rule, evaluate literary work and write a critical response, and to understand thanks to serious work, is the philosophical basis for modern values ​​that make the individual more employment, but also give the personality, a wide view, and the formation of good citizens. The possession of practical knowledge of the basics of civil education and history is also not harmful. Funny policy on artificial intelligence. As far as colleges are concerned, the first step must be to deal with the matter seriously. Many of them have vague or vague policy on artificial intelligence, and many of them hope the problem will disappear on its own. She must be clearly clarified when the use of these instruments is acceptable – the ideal aspect, under the supervision of a professor and within a clear educational purpose – and what are the consequences of abuse. There are different precedents: For example, the Bill of Honor has shown that it reduces fraud, especially if the colleges take this covenants seriously, and students know exactly what unacceptable behavior is, and fines are imposed on transgressions by origin. Also read: Artificial intelligence sometimes deceives to ensure its survival. Are anyone interested? Another clear step is to increase assessments in the class, as the demand of students to perform tests using the article, and not only cheating on the pen on the day of the exam but also providing an incentive throughout the semester to master the subject. The same goes for oral exams; Colleges should try other innovative and strict evaluation methods that take into account artificial intelligence. There is no doubt that it will require everything more work from the professors, but they must realize that it is in their direct interest. Technology is part of the long -term solution, technology can be part of the solution. Last year, the investigations of Bloomberg Business Wake found that the tools for the detection of artificial intelligence produced are still limited abilities: It is easy to be void and is exposed to false positive errors. But as colleges intensify their procedures, the market must mature, improve the performance of software and decrease the temptations of fraud. Students did indeed use screen records and other ways to prove that they worked themselves; And if it’s known, it’s much better. University students have always cheated, and they will always continue to do so. The idea is to make it up, consequences, and most importantly, to start the formation of norms on campus according to a new and very strange era. The future of universities can depend on this.