Jakarta – 12 figures were voluntary to pronounce legal opinions in the form of Amicus Curiae in a pre -hearing submitted by former Minister of Education and Culture Nadiem Makarim. The Attorney General’s Office responded to the submission. Director of Prosecution (Dirtut) Jampidsus Attorney General, Sutikno, said the submission of Amicus Curiae was regulated in the Criminal Procedure Act (Kuhap). According to him, the figures that were voluntary as Amicus Curiae also understood them. “The forerunner is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, the space and scope are also determined, the material is not in the subject. The existence of several parties submitted by Amicus Curiae certainly understands the space and scope of the precursor,” Sutikno said on Saturday (4/10/2025). Browse to continue with the content between the 12 digits, there is a former lawyer General Marzuki Darusman to former KPK leader Amien Sunaryadi. Sutikno was reluctant to comment a lot about it. He assured only the determination of the suspect against Nadiem Makarim in the case of alleged corruption in obtaining Chromebook shooters, in accordance with the rules. “If we handle the business, everything is based on valid evidence found because it is indeed our work,” Sutikno said. 12 First Promongs introduces themselves, reports that as many as 12 figures were voluntary as Amicus Curiae in the Nadim Makarim pre -trial. The request was filed in the first session of Nadiem’s forerunner at the South Jakarta District Court on Friday (3/10/2025). Researchers at the Arsil Arsil’s Judicial Independence (Leip) Study and Advocacy Institute and Transparency International Natalia Soebagjo members read the request in court. “Amicus Curiae is intended to provide input to the noble presidential judge regarding important issues that must be investigated in the preliminary process regarding the validity of determining someone as a suspect,” Arsil said. Arsil said that ten other figures were unable to deliver the Amicus Curiae directly to the hearing. He said Amicus Curiae is not only meant for the forerunner of Nadim, but also a precursor to the determination of suspects in general. “This legal opinion is not specifically aimed at this case, but also for the provisional investigation into the determination of suspects in general for maintaining the principle of fair trial in law enforcement in Indonesia,” he said. Arsil said his party did not ask the judge to award or reject the forerunner of Nadim. Amicus Curiae, he continued, was transferred to how the preliminary process should have tried someone. (Ond/Aik)
Response from the Office of the Attorney General 12 Figure which proposes Amicus Curiae Nadiem
