The WAQF Act 1995 and the WAQF Amendment Act 2025 were disputed by filing a pill in the Supreme Court. The petition tried to secure the assets of Hindus and non -muslims with notifications and orders from the WAQF Council. It was said that the court must declare that no notice issued under the Waqf Act 1995 will apply to the property of Hindus and not -Muslims. Mala Dixit, Jagran, New -Delhi. So far, it has been believed that only Muslims or politicians reach the Supreme Court in the case of the WAQF Act, but Hindus also moved the High Court against the WAQF Act. Pill was disputed in the Supreme Court, which disputed the Waqf Act 1995 and the WAQF Amendment Act 2025 and discriminated against Hindus and non-Muslims. The petition submitted in the Supreme Court tried to secure the assets of Hindus and not -Muslims with the notices, notices and orders of the Waqf Council. It has been said that the court must declare that no notice, order or rules issued under the WAQF Act 1995 will not apply to the property of Hindus and not -Muslims. In the pill, the pill was attempted to cancel it against Article 14,6,7,8,54,85,89 and 101 of the Constitution against Articles 14,15,25,27,27,300-A and 323A of the Constitution. This petition was submitted in the peak court by Parul Kheda, a resident of the Gautam Budh Nagar district of Uttar Pradesh. WAQF Amendment Act 2025. Let us know that the center recently implemented the WAQF Amendment Act 2025. This law is opposed by Muslim organizations and opposition parties and more than ten petitions have also been filed in the Supreme Court. The central government has also filed a cavity so that the court does not issue one -sided order without listening to its side. The Supreme Court will hear the case on April 16, the Supreme Court will hear the case on April 16. Recently, the petition filed disputed the WAQF Act, that is, the original 1995 law and the revised Act of 2025, in which he declares that this Act gives special status to WAQF Properties and the WAQF Council, in which the WAQF Council has the right to declare the property or society’s assets as WAQF assets, while Hindus and Muslim communities do not have such rights. The Manchet Act 1995 was mentioned against the principle of decomposition and equality that the WAQF Act was 1995 against the principle of slander and equality. In this Act, the special rights of the WAQF Council on WAQF Properties give a violation of sections 14 and 15 of the Constitution, the fundamental right to equality and Articles 25 and 26 right to religious freedom and Article 300A and 323. The petition states that Hindus and not -Muslims in the WAQF Act have no protection measures to prevent their own religious property and thus distinguishes this law against Hindus and not -Muslim communities. This law also violates the principle of Prakrit justice, as there is no process of protesting against the person concerned to give a chance to give a chance to hear and his assets in the list of assets. Not only the issue of discrimination on religious grounds in the WAQF Act, the petition not only raised the issue of discrimination on religious grounds in the WAQF Act, but also the issue of the money of tax pair for a specific religion. According to Article Eight of the Waqf Act 1995, the state government of the state government, the government is spent on the survey and notice of the property, which is a violation of Article 27 of the Constitution. This thing is also against the principle of secularism. Article 27 states that no person will be forced to pay taxes for promoting a specific religion. The petition also does not give public notice in the Act, but there is also no provision to issue any kind of public notice in this Act, so that people from Hindu or non -Muslim community do not know the order. Articles 54 and 55 of the WAQF Act received special rights to remove the violations of WAQF properties, while these rights do not have the trustees, monasteries, temples, arena and religious assets with trustees, managers, Shabayats, Mahants and the management of religious property. The ban on the handling of the tribunal disputes associated with WAQF properties is illegal, if the WAQF Act is seen, the Waqf Tribunal itself hears the dispute for declaring the WAQF property. This new petition states that the dispute between the two communities about the property is of a complicated nature and that knowledgeable efficiency needs it to decide it. Provisions of dispute with the dispute tribunal are an illegal semi -rights authority of Tribuon and cannot be in it. Civil courts have better resolved the civil nature disputes, in such a situation, the WAQF legislation with WAQF properties is illegal to handle the tribunal. Also read the Caste Census report presented in Karnataka, recommendation to increase backward class discussion to 51 percent, every latest news and accurate information in the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app
-
-
-
-
