Jakarta – Four defendants in the bribery corruption case whose verdicts were released in the cooking oil (migor) case have officially filed an appeal. Although one of the defendants previously admitted that he did not ask for a light sentence. For your information, the panel of judges that delivered the acquittal to the accused migrant corporation was led by Judge Djuyamto with members Agam Syarief Baharudin and Ali Muhtarom. Prosecutors accused Djuyamto, Agam and Ali of jointly accepting bribes and gratuities in connection with the acquittal. Prosecutors said the total bribe received is believed to be IDR 40 billion. The bribes were allegedly given by Ariyanto, Marcella Santoso, Junaedi Saibih and M Syafei as lawyers for the accused migrant corporations. Scroll TO CONTINUE CONTENTS The Rp. 40 billion in bribes were shared between Djuyamto, Agam, Ali, the former Deputy Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, and the former junior civil clerk of the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. In the prosecutor’s indictment, of the total bribe of IDR 40 billion, Arif was accused of receiving a share of IDR 15.7 billion, Wahyu received IDR 2.4 billion, Djuyamto received a share of IDR 9.5 billion, and Agam and Ali each received IDR 6.2 billion. Did not ask for a light sentence Djuyamto admitted that he did not ask for a light sentence in this case. Djuyamto asked for the fairest possible sentence. “If the defendant, as in the previous plea, I am not asking for the lightest possible sentence. I am firmly asking for the fairest possible sentence,” Djuyamto said when he read out the duplicate at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Wednesday (19/11/2025). Djuyamto believes the panel of judges will uphold justice. Djuyamto himself was sentenced to 12 years in prison. “Then I also remind you that law enforcement assigned to the honorable panel of judges, I believe is not only about the application of the law, but also to maintain justice as stated in the provisions of the Judiciary Act,” he said. Verdict Verdict They were also sentenced to prison. Djuyamto et al were found guilty of jointly accepting bribes in connection with the acquittal. The sentencing hearing was held at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Wednesday (3/12/2025). The judge found Djuyamto et al guilty of violating Article 6 paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 18 of the Corruption Act in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code. “The Accused was sentenced to 11 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 500 million with the stipulation that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 6 months,” said the judge. The judge stated that it was proven that Djuyamto received bribes totaling IDR 9,211,864,000, Agam Syarief Baharudin received IDR 6,403,780,000 and Ali Muhtarom received IDR 6,403,780,000. Money is received gradually. The following are the details of Djuyamto et al’s verdict: 1. Djuyamto was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment, a fine of IDR 500 million subsidiary 6 months imprisonment, and compensation of IDR 9,211,864,000 subsidiary 4 years imprisonment. 2. Agam Syarief Baharudin was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment, a fine of IDR 500 million subsidiary 6 months imprisonment, and compensation of IDR 6,403,780,000 subsidiary 4 years imprisonment. 3. Ali Muhtarom was sentenced to 11 years in prison, a fine of Rp. 500 million, subsidiary up to 6 months in prison, and compensation of Rp. File an appeal now Djuyamto et al have now officially filed an appeal. They did not accept the verdict that the panel of judges delivered in this case. The four accused are former Central Jakarta District Court Vice President Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, inactive judge Djuyamto, Agam Syarief Baharudin and Ali Muhtarom. “The first appeal registrant was Djuyamto on Monday (8/12), followed by others,” Central Jakarta District Court spokesman Sunoto told reporters on Thursday (12/11/2025). Sunoto said that former junior clerk replacing the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan, accepted the 11.5-year sentence handed down to him. However, the Public Prosecutor’s Office (JPU) filed an appeal for all the accused, including in the Wahyu case. “Specifically in case number 73 in the name of Wahyu Gunawan, the Accused accepted the verdict. However, the Public Prosecutor filed an appeal,” he said. Prosecutors ready to face appeals The Office of the Attorney General (Kejagung) said it is ready to face appeals filed by four defendants in the bribery case who were convicted in the cooking oil (migor) case. The AGO stated that all the demands of the public prosecutor were accommodated in the judge’s decision. “In principle, the prosecutor accepted it because all the content of the claims, including criminal charges, fines and compensation money, were accommodated by the judge and all the prosecutor’s considerations were taken over by the judge in his decision,” Anang told reporters on Thursday (11/12/2025). Anang said that his party is ready to face the appeal filed by the defendants. He said the prosecution would prepare an appeal memorandum and counter-appeal memorandum. “However, if the accused appeals, according to our SOP, the prosecutor will also file an appeal. At the same time, appeal and counter-memorial,” he said. (rdp/rdp)